An instantly recognized building if you grew up where Curmie did. |
At the risk of sounding like a MAGA, Curmie confesses that
the fact that an average of two local newspapers shut down every week in this country hadn’t really made an impression on him until… you know… it
directly affected him. Today is the last
day of publication for the Cortland Standard, which has filed for
bankruptcy after over 157 years of operation.
We had the paper delivered to our doorstep every day for the
time I lived in Cortland. Virtually
everyone referred to it as the “Substandard,” but actually it was quite a good
paper, or at least it was a half-century ago.
There was national and international news from agencies like the AP and
UPI, as well as coverage of what was happening in Albany. But mostly, there was local news.
Yes, a lot of the stories were rather quaint. Curmie’s name (and often, photo) appeared in
the Standard’s pages on several occasions for such relatively
inconsequential accomplishments as going on a field trip or appearing in the
high school play. But the paper did
serve to bring the community together. Getting
your name in the paper was kind of a big deal for adolescents. (Perhaps it still is?) It sounds kind of squishy to say that it made
us feel like we mattered, but it was true.
Moreover, in the pre-internet days, the local newspaper was
our primary local news source. The
television stations in Syracuse to the north or Binghamton to the south didn’t
cover our area unless something really important had happened, and if
they did, it would likely be a 90-second segment, offering about as much
information as a six column-inch article.
We’d check the Standard to see how the high school
basketball team did in that road game. We’d
be looking for something else altogether but come across a story about someone
we knew—or the parent, sibling, or child of someone we knew. It was a big enough city, with a population
of about 20,000, that the “everybody knows everybody” line wasn’t literally
true, but seldom did a day go by without my knowing personally someone whose
name appeared in those pages.
And that doesn’t even count the coverage of local
sports. (Obviously, Curmie knew a lot of
the athletes at his high school.) Predictably,
there was a lot more of that than anything else, but actually that makes
sense. There are generally two or three
sports going on at the same time of year, and between the high schools and the
college, there were local results to report virtually every day. It wasn’t that the high school choir concert
wasn’t covered; but there were fewer such concerts in a year than there were
basketball games in a fortnight.
There are, of course, manifold reasons why small-town
newspapers are folding. In their
farewell statement (linked above), the paper’s staff identifies the obvious:
declining readership and increasing cost.
The former is certainly understandable: the internet and social media
certainly lead to a sense of isolation, even as they pretend to do the
opposite. There are more and more texts
and IMs and fewer phone calls… and even fewer “let’s go get coffee” moments.
We also come to concentrate on our Facebook friends or those
who follow us X or whatever, at the expense of keeping up with those who don’t
have as much of an internet presence.
Curmie is as guilty of this anyone else, by the way. He’s pretty much lost touch with many of his
closest high school friends. Of course,
this is not at all intended to suggest that he doesn’t value those who may
indeed come to read these words.
The access to free news content on the internet also
contributes to the demise of smaller outlets, even if they also operate a
website, especially if it’s behind a paywall.
Why pay for national and international news if you can get the same
story at no cost? And now the question
becomes: is the local news, about people I’m less and less likely to know
or care about, sufficient to warrant the price of a subscription? (Curmie hasn’t subscribed to the local paper
here in Texas for twenty years or thereabouts.)
And, if I’m a businessperson, why should I pay to advertise in a medium
with declining reach, particularly, as is likely, if the remaining readers
aren’t in my target demographic?
But Curmie also calls your attention, Gentle Reader, to the
one specific factor highlighted in the paper’s closing editorial: “increasing
costs, including an expected 25% tariff on newsprint.” Translation: they get their newsprint from
Canada, and the Tangerine Toddler is threatening escalating tariffs. The reasonable rationale for the US to impose
tariffs is to protect American businesses from unfair competition. In the hands of a reckless buffoon, however,
the result is pushing at least one business over the edge into bankruptcy. Such is life in Trumpistan.
This essay isn’t about pointing the finger, however. It’s just an old man’s reminiscence of a time
when communities mattered, when Big Tech didn’t dominate the information
landscape, and when the local newspaper was a cherished part of small-town
life.
R.I.P., Cortland Standard. You had a great run, and you will be missed by many, even by those of us who haven’t read you in hard-copy in decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment