A typical evening at home for Curmie and Beloved Spouse
consists of watching a couple of episodes of television shows—some new, some
long since cancelled. We can access a
fair number of different streaming services, so we’re pretty well stocked with
options.
We’re particularly fond of mysteries, and that was last Saturday
night’s fare. Curmie won’t mention the
program or the episode, except to mention that it was fairly recent, so he
won’t risk spoiling something for you, Gentle Reader, but one of the shows
featured our central character pretty much solving the crime by noticing that a
photograph of a left-handed woman showed her holding a drink in her right
hand. That meant that she wasn’t really
sentient when the photo was taken and that the culprit was creating a false
alibi.
As this moment was unfolding on our TV screen, Curmie, who
is left-handed, was holding a glass of iced tea in his right hand. He laughed at the incompetence of the
writers; the general story line was pretty good, but that single moment spoiled
the entire episode for him. Beloved
Spouse noticed the error, too, but was less upset about it. We’ll come back to this in a moment.
This wasn’t the first time that we’ve experienced this
phenomenon—there have been a couple other variations on the theme that we’ve
seen in the last couple of months alone.
Of course, there was even a moment early in a Sherlock Holmes story in
which our hero is showing off for a prospective client, deciding which was the
man’s dominant hand based on which side of his face had been shaved first. Curmie had actually thought of that bit of
story-telling earlier in the day, when he realized that he had started to shave
on the other side of his face from usual practice.
Which hand we use to do things isn’t absolute, in other
words. Curmie is a leftie in the things
that make one a southpaw: writing, throwing, cutting, etc. And if he ever tried to shoot a gun or play
the guitar, he’d do them left-handed. But
for two-handed things: swinging a baseball bat (the one place that being a
leftie is actually a small advantage), a golf club, or an axe, he’s
right-handed. He’s a little more right-
than left-handed with a hockey or lacrosse stick, but is pretty close to ambidextrous
in those areas.
And he drinks with his right hand more than with his
left. Part of this is situational: his
accustomed seat is on the couch, with a TV tray to his right as he faces the
television. Part is cultural: if you
want to see what’s printed on your mug, you’ve got to drink with your right
hand. This, of course, is reasonable
given that about 90% of the population is right-handed. But part is probably natural inclination.
Of course, there are many other ways in which there is a
subtle but clear indication that right is right, and left is wrong. (We’re not talking politics here, of
course.) The fact that words like
“gauche” and “sinister” are linked to “left,” whereas “dexterous” is “right” is
more than accidental. But there are
pragmatic considerations, as well. Curmie
sometimes has to use his “wrong” hand to take the cap off a bottle of water,
for example: more strength is generated
turning the hand towards the body than away from it. Again, perfectly understandable. But left-handed spatulas, scissors, etc., are
often hard to come by, or are considerably more expensive. Curmie is only a couple months short of his 70th birthday, and has literally never seen a left-handed catcher’s
mitt or serrated knife.
But, Gentle Reader, you’ve no doubt already figured out that
this essay isn’t really about which hand you drink with. Rather, it’s about the thought that formed in
Curmie’s mind as he lay down to bed: that the writer of that television episode
must have been right-handed, because no leftie would possibly suggest that only
right-handed people could possibly drink with their right hand… and that the
reason Beloved Spouse wasn’t as upset as Curmie is because she’s right-handed.
Both of those suppositions are questionable at best, of
course, but that doesn’t change the fact that they formed in Curmie’s
mind. And that is what this piece
is about.
When it comes to privilege in this society, being a leftie
is about the only place Curmie is behind the curve. Among the things over which he had no control
but seem to have worked out in his favor are the facts that he’s a tallish cishet
white male, born into a middle-class family with two loving and supportive parents
who stayed together until his mom’s death when Curmie was already 37. He had some control over his success as a
student, but he was able to attend the colleges and universities of his choice
without fear of going into deep, long-term, debt.
Like most theatre people, he got his start as an actor: in an
arena in which there are more roles for men than for women, and more good women
than good men at the amateur level. In
other words, he didn’t need to be as good as his female friends were to gain
the experience that led to opportunities in other theatrical disciplines than
acting. That doesn’t mean he’s ashamed
of what success he’s had, or that he didn’t earn it, but he acknowledges that
he had fewer and lower hurdles to clear.
But he is left-handed, and suspects with some reason that
people who aren’t don’t fully understand.
Sure, Gentle Reader, if you’re right-handed you’re still fully capable
of intellectually appreciating some of the points made above. But you don’t understand viscerally unless
you live it day-by-day.
If you think about it, Gentle Reader, you’ll know why Curmie
is reluctant to sit in the middle of the table at the restaurant or why he doesn’t
use a lovely fountain pen he was given as a gift lest he smear ink all over the
document. But you probably won’t think
about it unprompted. That doesn’t make
you a bad person, or even someone lacking in empathy.
By the same token, Curmie can simultaneously understand and
not really understand what it’s like to be female, or LGBTQ+, or black, or
Hispanic, or to have grown up in poverty, or in a foster home, or with an
alcoholic parent, or… well, you get the point, Gentle Reader. Curmie is unlikely to be grabbed by ICE
unless he actively interferes with them (that could change in the future, but
we’re not there yet). Beloved Spouse’s
best friend and several of my favorite former students might not be so
lucky. Our lawn guy, who has a
pronounced Mexican accent, is probably at active risk.
The point is that virtually all of us are advantaged in some
ways and disadvantaged in others. And
we’re all going to do stupid things: both failing to appreciate the
consequences of what we say or do, and imagining ill intent where it didn’t
exist. The recent brouhaha over Sydney Sweeney’s ads for American Eagle is a prime example. It takes a peculiar
mix of paranoia and virtue signaling to get too upset over a play on words to
link “genes,” which are what make this conventionally beautiful young woman blonde and
blue-eyed, with “jeans,” which is what she’s selling. To suggest that AE and/or Ms. Sweeney are
advocating white supremacy or eugenics is, quite simply, daft. The whole point is that she, not to be
confused with all blue-eyed blondes, has great jeans/genes.
And stop the presses!
A clothing chain is using sex to get people to buy their product, an
event never before seen in the history of advertising. 😉 Indeed, one suspects that the folks at AE
knew their ad campaign would generate a response, which is precisely why they
went with it. Those ads have been
seen by a lot more people a lot more times than a more conventional series
would have received, and AE didn’t have to pay for most of it. This is a variation on the phenomenon that got DJT a lot of free publicity back in 2016.
There’s a lot of noise about how Sweeney’s career may be in jeopardy
because of the backlash, and that the Trump administration’s mocking of the
uproar will work against her. Curmie
doubts it, but it could happen.
But here’s the thing: maybe Curmie just doesn’t get it. He’s blue-eyed, after all, and was quite
blond as a wee lad. If his melanin count
were higher, would he respond differently?
Again, doubtful… but maybe.
There are indeed some racists, sexists, homophobes and
assorted other creeps out there. But
even this crusty old fart refuses to believe they are in the majority, even if
they seem to be in charge of an increasingly authoritarian and intentionally
cruel government. What we need to do is
three-fold. First, spend a little time
contemplating our collective tendency to conflate the specific and the general. Second, consider the possibility that
what we say or do isn’t what other people hear or see, or that what we see and
hear isn’t what other people intended to do or say. There’s a lot of communication theory about
this, which Curmie, in an unaccustomed fit of empathy, with not bore you with,
Gentle Reader.
Finally, we need to pick our battles. One of the things Curmie talked a lot about
as a director and occasional acting coach was the need to “have a place to go.” If everything is highlighted, then nothing is
highlighted. Similarly, detaining specific
illegal immigrants is different from rounding up everyone who “looks Hispanic”
and sending them to a concentration camp.
And there’s enough actual racism out there not to get caught up in
hypersensitivity.
By the way, Curmie is well aware of the irony of posting about over-reaction on a site which is pretty much devoted to that kind of response. He’s working on it.
