Regular readers of this blog will know that Curmie loves putting two or more stories together, finding a common theme. This time, it’s the apparently sacred, not-to-be-trifled-with words, “Black Lives Matter.” Curmie has already weighed in on that phrase and both its connotative and denotative meanings. The short version is that whereas black lives unquestionably matter (and there are some areas of life in America in which this concept has not always been made manifest), the Black Lives Matter movement is not above criticism.
Curmie has often observed, both in this blog and in his
classroom, that the ability to laugh at oneself is a signal of strength in a
system. We can trace this phenomenon
back at least as far as Athenian Old Comedy two and a half millennia ago. The best recent example came in the aftermath
to 9/11. That event shook us all. (It may have affected me in a variation on
survivor’s guilt: my brother-in-law was scheduled for a meeting high in one of
the Twin Towers that morning; it was called off shortly before the attack.) For a few days, the country reeled, and
everything was solemn reportage. We knew
we as a nation were emerging from the metaphorical if not the literal wreckage
when David Letterman went back on the air in New York; we knew we were really
going to be OK when he started telling jokes about President Bush.
Curmie, of course, is very much fond of humor in general and
wordplay in particular; that, along with “Black Lives Matter,” is the subject
of this essay.
Item #1:
This is either a foul on Joakim Maehle (#5 in red) or a flop by Raheem Sterling (#10 in white). |
Watching the replay, I thought that it would be impossible
to overturn the call, but it would also have been impossible to overturn a
no-call. BBC announcer Gary Lineker, who
in his playing career earned 80 caps and scored 48 goals for England in
international competition, saw it the same way I did. There is perhaps a reason he has the extremely impressive record of never receiving
even a yellow card in any type of game.
(Hey, if you can’t believe Wikipedia, who can you trust?)
What the video review did not do, contrary to the article
linked below, was “confirm” the call. It didn’t overturn the call; there’s a
difference. Plus, of course, there’s one of those unwritten laws that referees
don’t call penalty kicks late in a game unless there’s absolutely no question. So much for that idea…
Anyway, there’s a standing joke in Ireland that when it
comes to international sporting events, an Irishman’s favorite team, of course,
is Ireland. His second favorite team is whoever is playing England. So it’s not
surprising that Bernard O’Byrne, the CEO of Ireland’s basketball program, viewed
the episode, shall we say, through green-colored glasses. And Sterling is
black, so when the BBC posted on Facebook about the English victory, O’Byrne responded “BLACK DIVES MATTER!!!”
Curmie thinks it’s a pretty clever line, especially since
the call was so marginal. Moreover, Sterling
has something of a reputation for, well, diving. Needless to say, there was predictable outrage
from humor-deficient Woke Folk, and consequent groveling from O’Byrne and his
employer. Sigh.
This situation seems to Curmie to be a rather impressive
tempest in a demi-tasse cup, but at least we are talking about an episode in
which the race of an actual human being becomes at least indirectly the subject
of a gag.
Not so with Item #2.
But, as they say on the late-night infomercials: Wait, there’s
more! Someone commented “Black Lines
Matter,” and there was a Disturbance in the Force. Again, good line, yes? And to say there’s anything offensive about
the quip is to deny even the possibility of literally anything humorous having
the slightest connection to current events.
Count Curmie out of that mindset.
None of the foregoing should be taken to suggest that all proponents of Black Lives Matter are humorless sloganeers. (“Not all [fillintheblanks]…”) Nor is this a defense of the deliberately offensive, or even of tastelessness (Curmie would defend the latter, but that’s an issue for another day). But just as it would benefit us all if the nation were to more fully uphold the notion of “liberty and justice for all” promised by its rhetoric, it would also be a boon if some of the more hair-triggered of the SJWs and BLMers paused for a breath, a thought, and perhaps even a smile before opening the spout of righteous indignation.
No comments:
Post a Comment