![]() |
Masked ICE agent sprays Pastor David Black directly in the face. Photo by Ashlee Rezin of the Chicago Sun-Times |
Mrs. Hamilton was my teacher again in 5th grade,
and her friend visited us again. It
wasn’t until a couple of years later that I learned that the nice man was kind
of famous, and a few more years after that, that the “Holy shit, that
was Pete Seeger!” revelation dawned.
But it’s the other visitor I want to talk about today. I think his name was Dennis something, but I
might well be making that up. Exactly
why he showed up in our classroom, I don’t recall, if indeed I ever knew. I don’t remember how old I was, although
probably a tween. Anyway, Dennis (we’ll
call him that) was an FBI agent. He was
probably in his late 20s or early 30s, and he was dressed in the then-standard FBI
get-up: a cheap and rather ill-fitting black suit, with highly polished black
shoes, a white shirt, skinny black tie, and a crew-cut.
Dennis was clearly very proud of being in the FBI, and went
on for some time about that agency’s spotless record of integrity. I’m pretty sure he believed his own testimony,
as it wasn’t until a few years later that the atrocities of the J. Edgar Hoover
era became known. Indeed, Curmie,
who even in junior high was a skeptical lad, later found it very difficult to process
evidence of slander, intimidation, even assassination pointing to the agency as
perpetrators rather than investigators. The National Guard was, of course, a different story.
Dennis’s visit, that utter confidence in the rectitude, even
the incorruptibility, of the FBI, still lingers in Curmie’s memory over a half
century later, mostly because any such testimony now would be so risible that even
kids wouldn’t buy that nonsense for a moment.
Not with every federal allegedly law enforcement agency—ATF, FBI, ICE,
DHS, et al.—turned into a private army by a bullying POTUS incapable of any
emotions other than rage and paranoia. Rule of law?
What’s that?
Frighteningly enough, it may indeed be true that the FBI,
even headed by a mendacious moron like Kash Patel, is still the most uncompromised
of the federal agencies. We need only
look at the outrageous antics employed by ICE and their attendant lackeys in
other departments (and SCOTUS) in places like Los Angeles, Chicago,
and Portland,
to think that the FBI, though rendered incompetent, partisan, and corrupt, may
not be quite so bad in comparison.
It might also be worth noting that none of those three cities
appears on the US News and World Report list of the 25 Most Dangerous Places to Live.
Indeed, the top four cities, and eight of the top ten, in murder rate
per capita, are in red states. You know who checks in at #10? Shreveport, the biggest city in Mike Johnson’s
district. Yet there seems to be no
indication that federal troops will invade the Ratchet City. Go figure, huh? You know who doesn’t appear in the top 20? Los Angeles, Chicago, or Portland.
Over-zealous, violent, and often racist policing is, of
course, not a new problem. Yes, it has
been aggravated by the recklessness (at best) of the First Felon, but police
over-reach at all levels has been around for a long time. This situation is not, of course, exclusively
the result of the efforts of the authoritarian right, but it sure does seem
like there’s a correlation. More to the
point, whereas the problems haven’t changed, the degree has. Curmie has now reached the point at which he no
longer implicitly trusts any member of law enforcement at any level even to refrain
from brutality and to tell the truth, let alone to be competent at the job. That’s not a good place to be.
It is difficult to determine the rationale for impassioned
and utterly mendacious proclamations coming from ICE and DHS. They can’t really believe that dozens of heavily
armed, masked, and armor-protected agents are truly at risk in the presence of
unarmed protesters who are <checks notes> chanting at them. Can they?
It is certainly true that bullies, and anyone who would work for ICE either
is one or wants to be, are, by definition, cowards. And that particular variety of pusillanimity almost
always manifests in bluster and, more often than not, in outright lies.
The other alternative is more chilling. A number of left-leaning pundits suggest that
all this activity is intended for the sole purpose of raising tensions. If the authorities can plausibly claim they
were threatened, then a show of even more authoritarian power can at least
appear to be legitimized. So far, it’s
clear that the aggressors are nearly always the ones recently described by a
federal judge (a Reagan appointee, by the way) as “cowardly desperados.” Unfortunately, that may not last, which, goes
the theory, is precisely what Trump and his minions wants: an excuse to pretend
the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments don’t
exist.
Oh, and they’re not really big fans of the 2nd amendment,
either, unless the gun-toter is a white male who answers to “Bubba.” Witness the desperate attempt by DHS to claim
that Marimar Martinez was armed;
she had a gun that never left her purse, and a valid concealed-carry
license. Martinez’s lawyer says there’s
bodycam evidence that the federal agent, not Ms. Martinez, initiated the
collision between their vehicles. OK,
Gentle Reader, he’s not the most objective source, but the easy way to prove
him wrong is for the government to release the tape… guess what hasn’t
happened.
The pressure still needs to be applied, and Ghandi-like non-violence is difficult, but it’s the only way. Rising to the bait is the worst thing to do. In the words of today’s birthday boy, John Lennon, “When it gets down to having to use violence, then you are playing the system’s game. The establishment will irritate you – pull your beard, flick your face – to make you fight. Because once they’ve got you violent, then they know how to handle you. The only thing they don’t know how to handle is non-violence and humor.”
No comments:
Post a Comment