Thursday, October 22, 2026

Censorial Asshat Series: "The Wave." (#1 of 4)

 

Chances are, Gentle Reader, if you’ve been following this blog for any length of time, you know two things about Curmie even if you’ve never as much as met him: that he’s a retired theatre professor, and that he’s very much a 1st Amendment advocate.  It’s no surprise, then, that he’s chronicled over a dozen cases of high school and college theatre productions being shut down by school administrators or other morons for, let’s just say, less than persuasive reasons.  That doesn’t count the other shows that met similar fates but which Curmie mentioned only in passing… or, of course, those that he never even heard about.

One of Curmie’s best sources for information about such cases, going back to 2014, is Howard Sherman.  His blog, now called Downstage Center, migrated to Substack back in July.  This month, Sherman has written about four (!) cancelations of high school shows.  That’s a lot, needless to say.  Curmie intends to write about all four.  He’s decided to start with what he considers the least problematic of the stories (it’s bad enough, though) and move up to progressively stupider and less excusable examples.

Anyway, writing about all four is going to take a while and make for a very long blog post, indeed… so: each story gets its own post.  Curmie has decided to start with what he considers the least problematic situation and move up to the most colossally stupid.  You are free, Gentle Reader, to disagree with either the strategy or the ordering, but we’re doing the four stories in this order: The Wave  at Grunin Performing Arts Academy in Toms River, New Jersey, then Flashdance at Watertown HS in Wisconsin, She Kills Monsters at Copley HS in Ohio, and finally Little Shop of Horrors at South Grand Prairie High School in Texas.

A good way to open this discussion is by quoting the intro to Sherman’s series:

High school theatre productions are in rehearsal across the country, so it’s unfortunately inevitable that in a few cases, school theatre censorship rears its head as well. That these incidents all arose in the run up to the annual Banned Books Week is sadly fitting, especially when there is no Banned Plays Week to draw attention to this related, but separate, example of censorship in high schools.

So, let’s talk about The Wave.  We’re leading with this one primarily because Curmie knows nothing about the show other than what appears in Sherman’s article and what can be gleaned from a change.org petition.  Curmie quotes here from the latter:

The Wave is about a real incident that happened in a highschool in 1967, adapted from a novel into a stage play. It portrays an experiment that a teacher did on his class after they learned about World War II and Nazi Germany to show how people fell for what Hitler told them and how Germans who weren't Nazis didn't notice what was going on. The Wave shows how history can repeat itself when propaganda is presented as something nice and teaches a valuable lesson in individuality and thinking for yourself even when a group of people tells you otherwise.

The play was scheduled to be performed during School Violence Awareness Week, i.e., October 19-23.  Sherman quotes from the Asbury Park Press’s Ilana Keller that Superintendent Gary L. McDonald wrote that the school wanted to “create a culture of empathy and acceptance rather than divisiveness,” and was concerned that the students involved might not “fully understand the complexities of the material they were set to perform” or “feel the weight of responsibility to perform it with the sensitivity it requires.” 

The first of these is a very odd argument, given that the play appears to be an examination of anti-Semitism and how such hate-based ideologies can take hold.  Curmie might have thought that Fascism is rather more divisive than inclusive, and that therefore critiquing such a movement isn’t really all that bad.  This is why he will never be a high school administrator.  Well, that and worries that Medicare might not cover the required lobotomy.

As for McDonald’s worries about the play being performed for younger students, the solution appears pretty damned obvious: don’t show it to them.  That’s fundamentally different from not allowing the high school kids to do the show. 

That said, the concern that the students might not grasp the implications inherent in the show isn’t completely out of line.  It’s not an overwhelmingly persuasive argument and it comes rather too late in the process, but at least it’s not screaming-into-the-night looney.  That’s why it’s the least objectionable of the quartet of closures in Curmie’s mind.

Significantly, Curmie (because he’d signed that change.org petition) received an email a few days ago that the show is back on—not for its original October slot, but “some point in June of 2027.”  A link to the petition site led to a page saying, simply, “Victory!”  Whether the 1100+ signatures on that petition mattered at all, we can’t say, but they couldn’t have hurt.  Nor could the support of the New Jersey Thespians, the state’s chapter of the Educational Theatre Association, which sponsors the International Thespian Society, which as of seven years ago had inducted 2.3 million members (including Curmie).

The rationale offered by Grunin Principal Tierney Meeker is at least superficially reasonable, a variation on what we saw a couple years ago when school officials at Cesar Chavez High School in Phoenix delayed the opening of The Laramie Project by a week “due to the need for additional time to better prepare our audience and the public for the seriousness of the play’s content.” 

A six-month delay isn’t exactly the same as a one-week delay, but the perceived need to, in this case, “provide… students with meaningful educational opportunities, historical context, and access to resources that will deepen their understanding of the Holocaust, genocide, and the circumstances that allow prejudice, authoritarianism, and blind obedience to take hold” does sound familiar… and not entirely unreasonable.

That doesn’t mean that the school acted appropriately.  Howard Sherman’s follow-up piece, posted after the administration’s partial reversal, makes a couple of significant points: that the play was already well into rehearsal, and that school officials could have said initially that they were delaying rather than scuttling the production… or even, had the re-instatement been even under consideration, that they were contemplating such an action.  While it was important to make these arguments, it’s not like Sherman was opening vast new vistas of understanding: they’re pretty obvious.

Sherman also points out, however, something that might not come immediately to mind, but is just as important: a warning against “over-preparation,” which could actually diminish the play’s impact by taking away any element of surprise.  That’s why Ron Willis, one of Curmie’s most important mentors, actively discouraged having his Intro to Theatre classes read a play before seeing it.  This preparation is first cousin to the trigger warnings that Curmie wrote about earlier this month: if you know something is coming, you’re anticipating that moment instead of going where the play and production want you to go.  

It is also rather condescending to suggest to high school kids that they can’t really understand a play based on… wait for it… a classroom exercise for high school kids.  <Sigh.>  There are problems here... not as severe as those in the upcoming posts, but bad enough.

Anyway, there’s essay #1 in our series of 4.  Watch this space!

 

No comments: